<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BioHorizon &#187; Nervous</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.biohorizon.com/category/body-system/nervous/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.biohorizon.com</link>
	<description>Emerging Health Technology Surveillance and Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 00:24:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Oral Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis &#8211; Fingolimod (FTY 720) and Cladribine: How Close are Novartis and Merck KGaA to FDA Approval?</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2010/02/oral-therapies-for-multiple-sclerosis-fingolimod-fty-720-and-cladribine-how-close-are-novartis-and-merck-kgaa-to-fda-approval/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2010/02/oral-therapies-for-multiple-sclerosis-fingolimod-fty-720-and-cladribine-how-close-are-novartis-and-merck-kgaa-to-fda-approval/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adverse events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cladribine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA approval]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fingolimod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FTY720]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merck KGaA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiple Sclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novartis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oral therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These are interesting days for the first oral therapies targeting multiple sclerosis (cladribine and  fingolimod or FTY720) indeed, with both positive and negative events making news over the last several weeks.  On November 30th 2009,  Reuters reported that the FDA had issued Merck KGaA a &#8216;refuse to file&#8217; letter, which in effect is the FDA&#8217;s way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are interesting days for the first oral therapies targeting multiple sclerosis (cladribine and  fingolimod or FTY720) indeed, with both positive and negative events making news over the last several weeks.  On November 30th 2009,  Reuters reported that the FDA had issued Merck KGaA a &#8216;refuse to file&#8217; letter, which in effect is the FDA&#8217;s way of  saying that the New Drug Application (NDA) is incomplete and we believe dramatically decreases any chance of a mid 2010 release date for this drug.  On the flip side, and a more positive one, The New England Journal of Medicine  recently published three articles detailing what in our view are very well executed clinical trials- two with fingolimod and one with cladribine.  Given the high level of interest and some of the complexities we thought we would delve a little deeper. </p>
<p>Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, debilitating autoimmune disease that affects the brain and spinal cord. MS causes the body to direct antibodies and white blood cells against proteins in the myelin sheath that surrounds the nerves in the brain and spinal cord. This may cause inflammation and areas of scarring on nerves resulting in loss or decrease in function. An estimated 400,000 Americans have MS with about 2.5 million cases worldwide. </p>
<p>Current therapy for MS is focussed on prevention of relapses and/or slowing of disease progression using immunomodulatory drugs.  FDA approved therapies include Avonex (interferon beta-1a IM ), Betaseron  and Extavia, (interferon beta-1b SC ),  Copaxone (glatiramer acetate SC),  Rebif (interferon beta-1a SC), Novantrone (mitoxantrone IV) and Tysabri (natalizumab IV).   Some analysts place worldwide expenditures on these drugs at greater than 8 billion dollars annually.  Unlike fingolimod and cladribine which are pills taken by mouth, all of the above therapies are delivered by the intramuscular (IM) route, the subcutaneous (SC) route or the intravenous (IV) route. </p>
<p>Fingolimod is a sphingosine-1-phosphate-receptor modulator that is thought to work by preventing movement of lymphocytes from lymph nodes and in doing so decreases the damage that these lyphocytes can exact on the central nervous system.  Cladribine&#8217;s mechanism of action is different &#8211; 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine triphosphate &#8211; an active metabolite of cladribine accumulates in cells, disrupts their metabolism and leads to cell death.   Cladribine preferentially impacts lymphocytes and in doing so decreases the number of so called &#8216;autoagressive&#8217; cells available to attack the nervous system. </p>
<p>The two recently published clinical trials in the New England Journal of Medicine showed efficacy for cladribine (CLARITY trial) and fingolimod (FREEDOMS trial) when compared to placebo over a<sup> </sup>2-year period.  Statistical significance was achieved for the primary endpoint &#8211; which was the annualized relapse/recurrence rate in both trials.  In fact, the relative risk reduction was reported as an impressive 50%+ reduction in both trials.  In  a third trial comparing fingolimod to interferon beta 1a, fingolimod was superior. </p>
<p>Those familiar with the Tysabri story are well aware of the importance of safety when considering immune response modifiers in the treatment of multiple sclerosis and  the safety profile of cladribine and fingolimod will surely be closely scrutinized going forward.  A detailed discussion of the safety of these oral therapies is not possible here however adverse events of note described in these three trials included herpetic infections,  solid tissue cancers, macular edema, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, breast cancer, transient bradycardia, first- and<sup> </sup>second-degree heart block,   and lymphocytopenia.  Should approval of either of these agents occur, physicians and patients will need to do the requisite risk/benefit analysis before initiating treatment and FDA mandated post marketing surveillance will likely be critical in addressing any long term safety concerns.</p>
<p>This brings us to the next question &#8211; will physicians and patients get the chance?  Well, as mentioned in the first paragraph Merck KGaA was issued a &#8216;refuse to file&#8217; letter for cladribine suggesting anything but imminent approval while Novartis  filed its NDA for fingolimod in late January 2010.    Interested readers are directed to <a href="http://www.nejm.org">www.nejm.org</a> to access the three clinical trials referred to above in their entirety as well as an excellent accompanying editorial.  Thanks for reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2010/02/oral-therapies-for-multiple-sclerosis-fingolimod-fty-720-and-cladribine-how-close-are-novartis-and-merck-kgaa-to-fda-approval/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elan/Biogen Idec&#8217;s Antegren (Natalizumab) for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/elanbiogen-idecs-antegren-natalizumab-for-treatment-of-multiple-sclerosis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/elanbiogen-idecs-antegren-natalizumab-for-treatment-of-multiple-sclerosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2004 18:33:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antegren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autoimmune disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avonex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betaseron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biogen Idec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copaxone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crohn’s disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monoclonal antibody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multiple Sclerosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalizumab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phase III]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebif]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAM inhibitor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 26, 2004 Elan Corp.’s application for approval of its multiple sclerosis (MS) drug Antegren was accepted for review by the FDA. Elan has developed Antegren with U.S. partner Biogen Idec. The company has stated that this therapy represents a new approach in the treatment of MS and is expected to eventually generate annual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 26, 2004 Elan Corp.’s application for approval of its multiple sclerosis (MS) drug Antegren was accepted for review by the FDA. Elan has developed Antegren with U.S. partner Biogen Idec. The company has stated that this therapy represents a new approach in the treatment of MS and is expected to eventually generate annual sales of more than $1 billion. This estimate merits a 50/100 BioHorizon demand/diffusion variable score. The FDA, which granted Antegren ‘priority status’ in June 2004, will now review the New Drug Application and make its decision within 6 months as opposed to the standard 10 months. Completion of Phase III trials for the MS indication results in a BioHorizon efficacy variable score of 75/100.</p>
<p>Antegren is a humanized monoclonal antibody designed to inhibit the migration of immune cells into tissues where they may play a role in causing or propogating an inflammatory response. The company states that it is the first alpha-4 antagonist in the new selective adhesion molecule (SAM) inhibitor class. Approximately 2,800 patients have received natalizumab in clinical trials for both Crohn’s disease and MS; headache, fatigue, and nasopharyngitis were the most commonly reported side effects. BioHorizon has currently assigned Antegren a first in class 75/100 innovation status variable score.</p>
<p>Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, debilitating autoimmune disease that affects the brain and spinal cord. MS causes the body to direct antibodies and white blood cells against proteins in the myelin sheath that surrounds the nerves in the brain and spinal cord. This may cause inflammation and areas of scarring on nerves resulting in loss or decrease in function. An estimated 400,000 Americans have MS. BioHorizon utilizes an incident case number of 10, 400 new cases of MS in the U.S. per annum and assigns an 11/100 value to the burden of illness variable.</p>
<p>BioHorizon is currently monitoring 23 emerging technologies for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Of these 23 drugs, Avonex®, Betaseron®, Rebif®, and Copaxone® are already approved for this indication while Antegren is the only Phase III technology currently in the BioHorizon database. Although currently designated as Moderate Impact technology, we feel that the high degree of innovation exhibited by this treatment and the large unmet medical need surrounding MS will result in significant technology impact.  Health Services clients should commence preliminary assessment activities within the next quarter and watch for news regarding approval.</p>
<p><strong>Technology Details</strong><br />
Target Disease / Indication: Multiple Sclerosis<br />
Technology Classification: Drug<br />
Body System: Nervous System<br />
Program Area: Medicine/Neurology<br />
Regulatory Status: Phase III<br />
BioHorizon Impact Score: 53/100 – Moderate Impact</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/elanbiogen-idecs-antegren-natalizumab-for-treatment-of-multiple-sclerosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neurochem&#8217;s Alzhemed for treatment of Alzheimer&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/neurochems-alzhemed-for-treatment-of-alzheimers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/neurochems-alzhemed-for-treatment-of-alzheimers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2004 18:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer's Disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzhemed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aricept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glycosaminonglycans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Namenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurochem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phase III]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 18, 2004, Neurochem Inc. released interim data pertaining to a Phase II open-label extension study of the effects of Alzhemed on cognitive function and global measure of performance in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease. According to Neurochem, the study showed that approximately 70% of the mild AD patients had stabilized or improved cognitive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 18, 2004, Neurochem Inc. released interim data pertaining to a Phase II open-label extension study of the effects of Alzhemed on cognitive function and global measure of performance in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease. According to Neurochem, the study showed that approximately 70% of the mild AD patients had stabilized or improved cognitive function tests after 20 months of taking Alzhemed. The study is not placebo controlled double blind but rather an open -label extension study using comparable historical controls. Neurochem is currently running a North American Phase III clinical trial with Alzhemed for a period of 18 months in 50 U.S. and 20 Canadian clinical centers. Alzhemed Phase III clinical trial status merits an Efficacy score of 75/100.</p>
<p>It is estimated that in excess of 300, 000 patients are diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease annually in the United States. Biohorizon assigns Alzheimer’s disease a value of 33/100 for the Burden of Illness variable.</p>
<p>Current approved therapies for Alzheimer’s include Aricept® and Namenda®. Biohorizon is following 43 emerging drug therapies for Alzheimer’s disease. Seven of these therapies are in Phase III or beyond in their development. Neurochem contends that Alzhemed is a novel small molecule part of a new class of therapies that it calls ‘GAG (glycosaminoglycan) mimetics’.  Glycosaminonglycans are thought to play a role in the formation of amyloid plaques. In theory, interrupting the assembly of these plaques could alter the clinical course of disease. This unique approach earns Alzhemed an Innovation score of 75/100.</p>
<p>If approved, Alzhemed would represent a first in class therapy for a common, chronic disease. We see potentially significant demand and diffusion pressures, but at this time have assigned a 10/100 score to the Predicted Demand/Diffusion variable. Overall, Alzhemed is placed in Biohorizon’s Moderate Impact Technology category with an Impact Score of 51/100. We do not recommend any preliminary assessment activities for our health services clients at this time; however, favorable Phase III results could dramatically alter this position.</p>
<p><strong>Technology Details</strong><br />
Target Disease / Indication: Alzheimer’s Disease<br />
Technology Classification: Drug<br />
Body System: Nervous System<br />
Program Area: Medicine/Neurology<br />
Regulatory Status: Phase III<br />
BioHorizon Impact Score: 51/100 – Moderate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/neurochems-alzhemed-for-treatment-of-alzheimers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xenova Group&#8217;s TA-NIC for the Treatment of Nicotine Addiction</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/xenova-groups-ta-nic-for-the-treatment-of-nicotine-addiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/xenova-groups-ta-nic-for-the-treatment-of-nicotine-addiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2004 21:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acomplia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Addictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nabi Pharmaceutical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nicotine addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NicVax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phase I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanofi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking Cessation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TA-NIC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapeutic vaccine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xenova Group]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On July 14, 2004 Xenova Group plc released results of a second clinical trial with TA-NIC, a therapeutic vaccine under development for the treatment of nicotine addiction. The company reported that this randomized, placebo controlled, double-blinded study involved a total of 60 smokers and was designed to prove safety and tolerability data while measuring anti-nicotine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On July 14, 2004 Xenova Group plc released results of a second clinical trial with TA-NIC, a therapeutic vaccine under development for the treatment of nicotine addiction. The company reported that this randomized, placebo controlled, double-blinded study involved a total of 60 smokers and was designed to prove safety and tolerability data while measuring anti-nicotine antibody response in participants. The company reported no serious adverse events and indicated that anti-nicotine antibody levels were dose dependent. Although not an efficacy trial, 43% of smokers receiving TA-NIC either gave up smoking or reported a decrease in smoking related pleasure compared to 9% in the placebo group.</p>
<p>Nicotine by itself does not induce an antibody or immune response. However, when conjugated with an immunogenic protein such as recombinant cholera protein, an immune response is generated. These anti-nicotine antibodies may bind to the nicotine in a smoker’s blood and decrease or reduce the positive effects that nicotine creates in the smoker. In the Phase I trial, TA-NIC was delivered by 5 vaccinations over 8-20 weeks with a booster given 9 months after the first injection.</p>
<p>According to the 2001 National Health Interview Survey, approximately 22.8% of American adults (46.2 million) are currently smokers. Smoking rates in the United States have been declining since 1965.</p>
<p>The Biohorizon Emerging Health Technology Database contains two other emerging technologies for the treatment of Nicotine Addiction/Smoking Cessation, NicVax and Acomplia™. Notably, Nabi Pharmaceutical’s NicVax is another Phase I therapeutic vaccine, while Sanofi’s Acomplia™ is a Phase III drug therapy under development for both obesity and smoking cessation.  </p>
<p>TA-NIC is an early stage therapeutic vaccine for smoking cessation with interesting Phase I trial results and substantial obstacles in the form of pivotal Phase 3 trials to overcome. We currently recommend no assessment activities for health services clients at this time.</p>
<p><strong>Technology Details</strong><br />
Target Disease / Indication: Smoking Cessation/Nicotine Addiction<br />
Technology Classification: Drug<br />
Body System: Nervous System<br />
Program Area: Medicine/Addictions<br />
Regulatory Status: Phase I<br />
BioHorizon Impact Score: 53/100 – Moderate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/07/xenova-groups-ta-nic-for-the-treatment-of-nicotine-addiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dexanabinol</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/03/dexanabinol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/03/dexanabinol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2004 21:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dexanabinol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pharmos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traumatic Brain Injury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 15, 2004 Pharmos Corporation announced that it had completed patient enrollment in its pivotal Phase III study of dexanabinol for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). A total of 86 trauma centers recruited 860 patients. Pharmos expects to unblind the study data and announce initial results toward the end of this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On March 15, 2004 Pharmos Corporation announced that it had completed patient enrollment in its pivotal Phase III study of dexanabinol for the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).  A total of 86 trauma centers recruited 860 patients. Pharmos expects to unblind the study data and announce initial results toward the end of this year.</p>
<p>The purpose of the double-blind, placebo-controlled study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexanabinol as a neuroprotectant agent in severe TBI patients. Enrolled patients were given a single dose of 150mg dexanabinol or placebo within six hours after injury and received the standard care normally provided to TBI patients in intensive care units. The primary endpoint for the study will be patient outcome as measured on the Glasgow Outcome Scale &#8211; Extended (GOSE) six months after injury.</p>
<p>Physical trauma to the brain triggers a complex network of cascades that produce neuronal damage and death far beyond that caused by the initial insult. Dexanabinol, a tricyclic dextrocannabinoid, is thought to exert its neuroprotective effect through three mechanisms of action that suppress these toxic and inflammatory cascades induced by TBI: the inhibition of NMDA stimulated calcium influx, the inhibition of TNF alpha and other inflammatory cytokines, and free radical scavenging.</p>
<p>Annually in the United States, there are about two million emergency room visits for head injury, about 300,000 admissions for head trauma, and approximately 52,000 deaths. According to Pharmos Corporation, the annual market potential for a drug treating new TBI victims in the U.S. is over $500 million.  Currently, there is no FDA approved product for the treatment of severe head injury.</p>
<p>Dexanabinol remains a Moderate Impact Technology in the Biohorizon Emerging Health Technology Database, with no assessment activities recommended at the present time for clients operating trauma programs. However, Dexanabinol has the potential to transform the management of patients with severe TBI and as such should be monitored closely over the coming months.</p>
<p><strong>Technology Details</strong><br />
Target Disease / Indication<br />
Traumatic Brain Injury</p>
<p>Technology Classification<br />
Drug</p>
<p>Body System<br />
Nervous System</p>
<p>Program Area<br />
Medicine/Neurology</p>
<p>Regulatory Status<br />
Phase III</p>
<p>BioHorizon Impact Score<br />
51/100 – Moderate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/03/dexanabinol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indiplon</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/indiplon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/indiplon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2004 20:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiplon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insomnia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neurocrine Biosciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pfizer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indiplon On February 18, 2004 Neurocrine Biosciences said that preliminary results from a late-stage clinical trial showed that its experimental sleeping pill, being developed in conjunction with Pfizer, works in elderly patients with chronic insomnia. Results from its Phase III clinical trial with two doses (5 mg and 10 mg) of the immediate release formulation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indiplon<br />
On February 18, 2004 Neurocrine Biosciences said that preliminary results from a late-stage clinical trial showed that its experimental sleeping pill, being developed in conjunction with Pfizer, works in elderly patients with chronic insomnia. Results from its Phase III clinical trial with two doses (5 mg and 10 mg) of the immediate release formulation of indiplon achieved statistically significant results in elderly patients with chronic insomnia. Results of the primary endpoint for this study, Latency to Sleep Onset (LSO) or the amount of time it took patients to fall asleep as measured by patient self reported outcomes, was statistically significant for both doses (p<0.02 at 5 mg and p<0.005 at 10 mg) as compared to placebo. For LSO, the time to sleep was shortened by more than 27 minutes for both indiplon doses, more than a 40% reduction from baseline. Sleep quality was significantly improved (p<0.005) at both dose levels as compared to placebo. Results confirmed that elderly patients with chronic insomnia who took indiplon fell asleep more rapidly and stayed asleep longer with fewer awakenings and reported improved sleep quality. Additionally, indiplon immediate release was well tolerated and there were no serious treatment-related adverse events reported in the study.</p>
<p>Indiplon is a unique non-benzodiazapine agent that acts on a specific site of the GABA-A receptor. Indiplon has been shown to bind selectively to the specific subtype of GABA-A receptors within the brain believed to be responsible for promoting sleep. There are two formulations of indiplon: immediate release and modified release. Both formulations are being studied in clinical trials to address different types of sleep problems. Insomnia is a prevalent condition in the United States, with nearly one-half of the adult population reporting trouble sleeping a few nights per week or more, according to the National Sleep Foundation's (NSF) Sleep in America Poll 2002. Approximately 35% of the adult population reports that they have experienced insomnia every night or almost every night within the past year. According to some analysts, the $2 billion market for sleep disorder drugs could eventually rise to $3 billion. However, we feel that existing approved therapies like Sanofi’s AmbienR, and King’s SonataR, combined with the promise of imminent new treatments like Sepracor’s Estorra™, make the insomnia marketplace a competitive one.</p>
<p>If approved, we feel indiplon will represent a Moderate Impact Technology, and recommend no early assessment activities at this time.</p>
<p><strong>Technology Details</strong><br />
Target Disease / Indication: Insomnia<br />
Technology Classification: Drug<br />
Body System: Nervous System<br />
Program Area: Medicine/Psychiatry<br />
Regulatory Status: Phase III<br />
BioHorizon Impact Score: 54/100 – Moderate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/indiplon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visudyne</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/visudyne/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/visudyne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macular Degeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ophthalmology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photodynamic Therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[QLT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visudyne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On January 29, 2004, U.S. health authorities expanded patient reimbursement for QLT’s Visudyne therapy to treat Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). The changes, which could take effect by October 2004, will make 40,000 to 60,000 new patients eligible for reimbursement, potentially doubling QLT&#8217;s current patient pool of about 60,000. Until now, Medicaid has covered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On January 29, 2004, U.S. health authorities expanded patient reimbursement for QLT’s Visudyne therapy to treat Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration (AMD).  The changes, which could take effect by October 2004, will make 40,000 to 60,000 new patients eligible for reimbursement, potentially doubling QLT&#8217;s current patient pool of about 60,000.  Until now, Medicaid has covered patients with classic age-related macular degeneration, but it will now also include those with the so-called occult and minimally classic forms of the disease, a leading cause of blindness in people over 50.</p>
<p> Wet AMD is a disease that causes a loss of central vision.  It is caused by choroidal neovascularization (CNV), a growth of abnormal blood vessels under the central part of the retina, or the macula. These vessels leak fluid and cause scar tissue that attacks central vision, resulting in a deterioration of sight over a period that can range from a few months to three years. About 500,000 people are diagnosed with the eye disease each year, with 400,000 of those in the United States and Europe. Of those, 125,000 are classic, 175,000 are minimally classic and 200,000 have the occult form of the disease.</p>
<p>Visudyne therapy is a two-step procedure. Following intravenous administration, Visudyne is activated by a non-thermal laser light directed at the eye. This process is known as photodynamic therapy. Visudyne selectively targets abnormal blood vessels under the retina, resulting in a reduction in their growth, without affecting normal/healthy retina tissue. This in turn stops the leakage associated with wet AMD. Together with its partner Novartis, QLT reported Visudyne sales of $357 million dollars for the year ended Dec 31, 2003.  Wall Street analysts have projected earnings in the $500 million dollar range for 2004. There are currently no competing, approved, photodynamic therapies for the treatment of wet AMD.  In November 2003, a competing treatment showed &#8220;no improvement&#8221; over QLT&#8217;s treatment. According to a QLT statement, data from phase III trials for Macugen, a drug being developed by Pfizer and Eyetech Pharmaceuticals &#8220;do not appear to offer any treatment benefit over (Visudyne) &#8220;. </p>
<p>We feel Visudyne represents true innovation, and based upon our assessment of disease prevalence, treatment efficacy, and demand/diffusion characteristics have designated it a High Impact health technology. We are advising clients to initiate preliminary assessment activities.</p>
<p><strong>Technology Details</strong><br />
Target Disease / Indication: Age Related Macular Degeneration<br />
Technology Classification: Drug-Photodynamic Therapy<br />
Body System: Nervous System<br />
Program Area: Surgery/Ophthalmology<br />
Regulatory Status: Approved<br />
BioHorizon Impact Score: 73/100 – High</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/visudyne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Namenda</title>
		<link>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/namenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/namenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2004 14:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nervous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alzheimer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forest Laboratories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memantine HCL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Namenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMDA antagonist]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.biohorizon.com/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In October of 2003, Forest Laboratories announced FDA approval of Namenda™ (memantine HCL) for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. This new therapy is the first of a new class of drugs for Alzheimer’s disease known as NMDA antagonists. Namenda is thought to decrease the affinity of the NMDA receptor for a neurotransmitter known as glutamate, which plays [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In October of 2003, Forest Laboratories announced FDA approval of Namenda™ (memantine HCL) for moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease. This new therapy is the first of a new class of drugs for Alzheimer’s disease known as NMDA antagonists. Namenda is thought to decrease the affinity of the NMDA receptor for a neurotransmitter known as glutamate, which plays an integral role in the neural pathways associated with learning and memory. The company recently announced plans to submit a supplementary application to the FDA that will broaden the indication to include the mild-to-moderate spectrum of the disease.  A 1998 American Journal of Public Health article cited the prevalence of Alzheimer&#8217;s disease in the United States as 2.32 million (range: 1.09 to 4.58 million).  It is projected that the prevalence will nearly quadruple in the next 50 years by which time approximately 1 in 45 Americans will be afflicted with the disease. Currently, the number of new or incident cases is approximately 360,000/year.</p>
<p>A 28-week study published in the New England Journal of Medicine compared memantine with placebo in persons with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer&#8217;s disease.  Among the patients who completed the study, memantine appeared to confer benefit in terms of activities of daily living and other measures.  A second study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association concluded that: “In patients with moderate to severe AD receiving stable doses of donepezil (Aricept), memantine resulted in significantly better outcomes than placebo”.  These results together with previous studies, suggest that memantine represents a new approach for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe AD. Currently advertised Internet prices place the cost of treatment at approximately $6.00/day or $2190/year for 112 tabs (from www.memantine-supple.com, accessed Jan 30, 2004). This is comparable to the cost of Aricept. The study in JAMA raises the possibility of Namenda being used in addition to Aricept in the control of Alzheimer’s and would represent an approximate doubling of direct drug costs per patient.  Wall Street analysts have estimated sales for Namenda in the $800, 000, 000/year range. Forest Laboratories have announced recent substantial increase in sales force to support anticipated sales requirements.  </p>
<p>We think that Forest Laboratories’ Namenda has the potential to become a High Impact health technology and therefore recommend pharmacy and therapeutic programs begin some early assessment activities.  Particular attention should be paid to therapeutic regimens using Namenda in addition to Aricept as this represents a significant direct cost increase.  </p>
<p><strong>Technology Details</strong><br />
Target Disease / Indication: Alzheimer&#8217;s Disease (moderate to severe)<br />
Technology Classification: Drug<br />
Body System: Nervous System<br />
Program Area: Medicine<br />
Regulatory Status: Approved<br />
BioHorizon Impact Score: 75/100 – High</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.biohorizon.com/2004/02/namenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
